{"id":728,"date":"2018-03-13T08:50:09","date_gmt":"2018-03-13T08:50:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/yenimedya.aydin.edu.tr\/?page_id=728"},"modified":"2018-07-17T08:35:14","modified_gmt":"2018-07-17T08:35:14","slug":"ejnm_v02i2101","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/yenimedya.aydin.edu.tr\/tr\/ejnm_v02i2101\/","title":{"rendered":"ejnm_v02i2101"},"content":{"rendered":"

MEDIA DISCOURSE, IDEOLOGY AND PRINT MEDIA IN TURKEY<\/strong><\/p>\n

Beg\u00fcm BAYRAK<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

ABSTRACT<\/strong><\/p>\n

This article addresses power, ideology and media context generally. .In democratic countries, the free media is regarded as the \u201cfourth estate\u201d besides the legislative, executive and judiciary branches. It can be said that political power has a significant role in shaping media discourse. The newspapers as the most efficient print media elements have an effective role in media discourse. Besides determining political agenda, the newspapers function as the instrument of hegemony of the political authority. The objective of this article is two-fold. The first is to analyze the role of the media discourse in the (re)production of ideologies. Within this framework, the role of the media in democratic countries will also be under scrutiny. Second,a historical overview of Turkish print media in general and the H\u00fcrriyet newspaper in particular will be provided. Bourdieu argues that, the power of the words lies not in their intrinsic qualities but in the belief that they are uttered by authorized spokespersons (Bourdieu, 1991: p.170). In this context, one of the main arguments of this article is that the Hurriyet newspaper as one of the leading voices of the mainstream media is efficient in determining the political and social agenda. The qualitative research method is used in the article.<\/p>\n

Keywords:\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>Ideology, power, media, media discourse, print media in Turkey<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

MEDYA S\u00d6YLEM\u0130, \u0130DEOLOJ\u0130 VE T\u00dcRK\u0130YE\u2019DE YAZILI BASIN<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00d6Z<\/strong><\/p>\n

Bu makale genel olarak g\u00fc\u00e7, ideoloji ve medya s\u00f6ylemini irdelemektedir. Demokratik \u00fclkelerde \u00f6zg\u00fcr medya yasama, y\u00fcr\u00fctme ve yarg\u0131 erkinin yan\u0131nda \u201cd\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc kuvvet\u201d olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Siyasal g\u00fcc\u00fcn medya s\u00f6ylemini \u015fekillendirmede \u00f6nemli bir rol\u00fc oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenebilir. En etkili yaz\u0131l\u0131 medya unsurlar\u0131ndan olan gazeteler medya s\u00f6yleminde \u00f6nemli bir role sahiptirler. Siyasal g\u00fcndemi belirlemeye ek olarak gazeteler siyasal iktidar\u0131n hegemonya arac\u0131 olarak da i\u015flev g\u00f6rmektedirler. Bu makalenin \u00e7ift y\u00f6nl\u00fc bir amac\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r. Birincisi, ideolojilerin s\u00f6ylemsel olarak \u00fcretilmesinde medya diskurunun rol\u00fcne \u0131\u015f\u0131k tutmakt\u0131r. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7eve i\u00e7inde, demokratik \u00fclkelerde medyan\u0131n rol\u00fc analiz edilecektir. \u0130kinci olarak genelde T\u00fcrk yaz\u0131l\u0131 bas\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6zelde ise H\u00fcrriyet gazetesi tarihi bir \u00f6zet ile analiz edilecektir. Bourdieu\u2019a gore (1991, p. 170), kelimelerin g\u00fcc\u00fc onlar\u0131n i\u00e7kin \u00f6zelliklerinde de\u011fil onlar\u0131n yetkin s\u00f6zc\u00fcler taraf\u0131ndan ifade edilmesindedir. Bu ba\u011flamda H\u00fcrriyet gazetesinin anaak\u0131m medyan\u0131n ba\u015fat seslerinden biri olarak siyasal ve sosyal g\u00fcndemi belirlemede etkili oldu\u011fu makalenin temel iddialar\u0131ndan biridir. Makalede nitel ara\u015ft\u0131rma y\u00f6ntemi kullan\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Anahtar Kelimeler:<\/em><\/strong> \u0130deoloji, g\u00fc\u00e7, medya, s\u00f6ylem, medya s\u00f6ylemi, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de yaz\u0131l\u0131 medya
\n<\/em><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

TAM MET\u0130N
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

PDF<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

KAYNAKLAR<\/strong><\/p>\n

Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.New York: Monthly Review Press.<\/em><\/p>\n

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press<\/em><\/p>\n

Burak, B. (2010). T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin Siyasal ve Y\u00f6netsel Ya\u015fam\u0131nda 28 \u015eubat S\u00fcreci\u2019nin Yeri \u00dczerine Bir \u0130nceleme (Master Dissertation, Istanbul University).<\/em><\/p>\n

Duran, R. (2003). T\u00fcrk Medyas\u0131 Neden Sava\u015f Yanl\u0131s\u0131. Sava\u015f ve Medya. Eski\u015fehir: ILAD.<\/em><\/p>\n

Eagleton, T. (1991).\u00a0Ideology: An Introduction. London: Verso.<\/em><\/p>\n

Efe, \u0130. (2012). Critical Discourse Analysis of Kemalism and Islamism in Turkish Newspapers: The 2008 Indictment Case the 28 February National Security Council Meeting (Doctoral Dissertation, Lancaster University).<\/em><\/p>\n

Fairclough, N. L. Wodak .R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In, Teun A. V. D.Discourse Studies. A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Vol. 2. Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage. 258-284<\/em><\/p>\n

Fontana, B. (2005). The Democratic Philosopher: Rhetoric as\u00a0Hegemony in Gramsci, .ItalianCulture.Vol: 23. No: 1. . 97-123.<\/em><\/p>\n

Foucault, M. (1979). Disciplin eand Punish: the Birth of the Prison<\/em>. <\/em>Harmondsworth: Penguin<\/em><\/p>\n

Foucault, M. (1984). The Order of Discourse. \u0130n Shapiro, M. Language and Politics. London: Blackwell. 108-138.<\/em><\/p>\n

Gaventa, J. (2003).\u00a0Power After Lukes: A Review Of TheLiterature. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies<\/em><\/p>\n

Hoare, Q.,Geoffrey, N.S. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci.New York: International Publishers.<\/em><\/p>\n

Gurevitch, M.,Levy, M. R. (1985).\u00a0Mass Communication Review Yearbook. Sage Publications Inc.<\/em><\/p>\n

Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge:PolityPress.<\/em><\/p>\n

Herman, E. S. and Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing Consent: ThePoliticalEconomy of the Mass Media. New York: PantheonBooks.<\/em><\/p>\n

Holmes, S. (1991). Liberal constraints on private power? in Lichtenberg, J. Democracy and theMass Media. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress. 21-65.<\/em><\/p>\n

Kaya, R. \u00c7akmur, B. (2010). Politics and the mass media in Turkey. Turkish Studies. Vol: 11. No:4. 521-537.<\/em><\/p>\n

Keane, J. (1991). The Media and Democracy. Cambridge: PolityPress<\/em><\/p>\n

Lasswell, Harold D. (1948). \u201cThe structure and function of communication in society\u201d. in Bryson, L. (ed.). The Communication of Ideas. New York: Harper & Co. Pp. 37-51<\/em><\/p>\n

Montgomery, M. (1995).\u00a0An \u0130ntroduction To Language AndSociety. London: Routledge.<\/em><\/p>\n

Patrick H, N. (1998). Democratization and MassCommunication: What Is the Link. inO\u2019Neil, Patrick H. Communicating Democracy: The Media &Political Transitions.London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u00d6zerkan, \u015e.(2009). Haber Analizi Ve Ar\u015fiv \u0130ncelemeleriyle T\u00fcrkiye’de 9 Gazete. Ankara: Nobel Yayin<\/em><\/p>\n

Somer, M. (2010). Media Values And Democratization: What Unites And What Divides Religious-Conservative And Pro-Secular Elites?.Turkish Studies. Vol:11. 555-577<\/em><\/p>\n

Thompson, J. B. (1984). Studies in The Theory Of Ideology. Cambridge: Polity Press.<\/em><\/p>\n

Topuz, H. (2003). II. Mahmud’tan Holdinglere T\u00fcrk Basin Tarihi. \u0130stanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.<\/em><\/p>\n

Torfing, J.\u00a0(1999). New Theories Of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe And Zizek. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.<\/em><\/p>\n

Tun\u00e7, A. (2010). Mediated Justice: Turkish Newspapers\u2019 Coverage of Controversial Criminal Cases.\u00a0Turkish Studies.\u00a0Vol: 11 No:4. 643-661.<\/em><\/p>\n

Wodak, R. (1999). Critical discourse analysis at the end of the 20th century. Research on Language &Social Interaction\u00a0Vol: 32. No: 1-2 185-193.<\/em><\/p>\n

Wodak, R. Michael, M. (2009).\u00a0Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.<\/em><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

MEDIA DISCOURSE, IDEOLOGY AND PRINT MEDIA IN TURKEY Beg\u00fcm BAYRAK   ABSTRACT This article addresses power, ideology and media context generally. .In democratic countries, the free media… <\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-728","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/yenimedya.aydin.edu.tr\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/728"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/yenimedya.aydin.edu.tr\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/yenimedya.aydin.edu.tr\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yenimedya.aydin.edu.tr\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yenimedya.aydin.edu.tr\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=728"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/yenimedya.aydin.edu.tr\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/728\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":795,"href":"https:\/\/yenimedya.aydin.edu.tr\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/728\/revisions\/795"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/yenimedya.aydin.edu.tr\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=728"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}