The peer review process in scientific journals is a rigorous and structured procedure used to determine whether research articles meet scientific and academic quality standards. This process begins when a manuscript is submitted to the journal. After the author submits the manuscript, the journal’s editors first assess whether the manuscript fits within the journal’s scope, subject area, and basic scientific requirements. This initial evaluation is crucial to determine how well the manuscript aligns with the journal’s publication policies and quality standards. If the manuscript passes this stage, it is selected to be sent to peer reviewers, who are experts in the field.
The peer review stage involves a thorough examination of the manuscript’s content, methodology, data analysis, writing style, and conclusions. In the e-Journal of New Media, a double-blind peer review process is used, meaning reviewers do not know the identity of the authors. Reviewers assess the manuscript based on their expertise, evaluating its scientific contributions, innovative aspects, validity of methods, and accuracy of the findings. They also evaluate the writing quality and adherence to academic standards. The review process typically takes 2-3 weeks, but the depth and extent of the analysis by reviewers can influence this timeline.
As a result of the review, several decisions may be made regarding the manuscript’s acceptance. Reviewers may recommend publication, but often they request that the author make specific revisions. These revisions may involve clarifying the text, strengthening the methodology, or presenting data analysis in a more robust manner. If the reviewers indicate that substantial revisions are necessary, the manuscript is returned to the author, who is asked to include a “response letter” addressing the changes made and how the reviewers’ suggestions were incorporated. The revised manuscript may then be sent back to the reviewers for a second evaluation. This stage assesses whether the changes are sufficient and how well the suggestions were applied. The final decision is always made by the editors, who evaluate both the reviewers’ feedback and the revisions made before determining whether the article will be published. If the manuscript is rejected, it is typically due to the reviewers and editors finding the scientific contribution or methodological integrity insufficient.
At the end of the peer review process, accepted manuscripts are prepared for publication, and any typographical or formatting errors are corrected through final editorial review.
In conclusion, this detailed and stringent peer review process in scientific journals ensures the accuracy, reliability, and quality of research contributing to the scientific literature. This process supports the advancement of the academic community, preserves academic standards, and facilitates the international recognition of research.